Movie Review: The Fifth Estate
Hey guys! It’s been
a few days, but I’m back now! Recently I went to see The Fifth Estate, based on a book written by Daniel Berg about
Julian Assange and Wikileaks.
This movie has been getting
less than stellar reviews, and after seeing it, I can see why. The film spans
between 2007 and 2010 and covers the entirety of Daniel Berg’s (played by
Daniel Bruhl) association with Wikileaks, beginning the first time he meets the
enigmatic Julian Assange (played by Benedict Cumberbatch). It starts with a few
low-profile leaks, and ends with the leaks that recently put Chelsea Manning
(still called Bradley Manning in the film) behind bars.
To begin, the acting is
phenomenal. Cumberbatch and Bruhl work flawlessly together to lay out the
relationship Assange and Berg had. Cumberbatch disappears into Assange, with a
perfect accent and twitchy mannerisms. He crafts an insane, manipulative
megalomaniac on an intense mission with few tangible goals. It’s brilliantly
nuanced, and shows his abilities as an actor. Assange floats in and out of
scenes, partially because the story is told from Berg’s perspective and
partially to maintain some sort of mystery about him. Unfortunately, neither character
is particularly well-written. It seems a shame to waste such talent. As a side
note, Assange’s hair was atrocious, and I don’t mean just the style. The wig
didn’t resemble human hair, and it was noticeably distracting.
The movie was billed as telling
both sides of the story. Laura Linny and Stanley Tucci play for the American
side as government officials whose friends, colleagues, and careers are
affected by the leaks. If anything, I feel that they were underused. More of
them could have made the plot a little bit more driven.
Also joining the cast are
David Thewlis, Peter Capaldi, and Dan Stevensen as three reporters from the
Guardian. They stand out as being part of a journalistic tradition that Assange
is quickly working to make obsolete.
The writing really is just
bad. It spends more than half of the more-than-two-hours building up to the
main action of the story. It’s meandering, full of stops and starts that pull
you in and out of action and make the movie drag on and on. The main problem
with this is that it is hard to quantify the intensity of the internet into a
movie. It’s a lot of close-ups on hands typing and the reflection of screens
onto faces. It makes for a pretty picture once, but after an hour or two of
that it gets a little old. The best part of the movie (sadly) is a montage of
communication starting in the stone age and ending in the modern time that
takes up the first few minutes of the movie. The movie is also generally
humourless. The closest thing is Assange flailing like an octopus in a
Norwegian nightclub. Together, these things had me looking at my watch around
the hour-and-a-half mark.
This is the kind of movie
that you watch on TV two years from now in the afternoon while you’re folding
laundry. It won’t ever be my first choice for a movie, but it’s not strictly bad. The acting does redeem it. A
little. I’d give it a 5/10.
What’s your favourite new movie this fall?